Ursula von der Leyen, in response to a wolf killing a family pony, is pushing for the reversal of decades of environmental policy and gone on a jihad against wolves in Europe, claiming, among other things, that wolves constitute a threat to people.
Wolves do not constitute a threat to human beings. There has never been a documented wolf attack in the wild in North America, and there has not been even a poorly documented attack in Europe for over 500 years.
The technical term for this is self-important narcissistic destructive bullshit.
Fuck Ursula von der Leyen, and the horse that she did not ride in on, because wolves ate it:
It was a mild, windless night, sometime before dawn on 1 September 2022, when a large grey wolf trotted out of the woods beside Beinhorn, a hamlet of old barns and graceful wooden houses in the German state of Lower Saxony. The keen nose of the male wolf almost certainly scented that Dolly, a pretty chestnut pony with a white patch on her face, was vulnerable. The 30-year-old pony, kept in a paddock close to stables and a farmhouse, was not protected by high-voltage electric fencing designed to deter wolves. It was an easy kill. In the morning, Dolly’s body was found in the long grass; her owners spoke of their “horrible distress”.
Unluckily for the wolf, and perhaps for the
entire wolf population of western Europe, Dolly was a cherished family
pet belonging to the president of the European Commission, Ursula von
der Leyen, one of the most powerful people in the EU. Last September, a
year after Dolly’s death, von der Leyen announced plans that to some
wolf-defenders looked like revenge: the commission wants to reduce the wolf’s legal protection.
Action
had already been taken against Dolly’s killer. DNA evidence harvested
from the pony’s carcass revealed that the wolf was an individual known
as GW950m. This mature male wolf, which heads a pack (a wolf family
usually numbering eight to 10) living around the von der Leyen
residence, appears to have developed a taste for livestock. DNA tests on
other carcasses implicates him in the deaths of about 70 sheep, horses,
cattle and goats. Experts believe younger pack members might have
copied his hunting methods. Because GW950m was now classified as a
“problem wolf”, a permit was issued to allow hunters to shoot him
legally (wolves can only be killed under exceptional circumstances,
according to EU law). It was the seventh such licence to be issued in
Lower Saxony, a state the size of Denmark with a thriving population of
at least 500 wolves – more than are found across the whole of
Scandinavia.
Thankfully, for now at least, GW950m remains alive.
………
Wolves have adapted swiftly and surely to human-dominated landscapes.
But people are struggling to adjust to the wolves. The concentration of
packs, von der Leyen declared when announcing the commission’s review of
wolf protection laws, “has become a real danger for livestock and
potentially also for humans”. In December, the commission proposed to reduce the wolf’s status
under the Bern Convention from “strictly protected” to “protected” in
order to introduce “further flexibility” – potentially enabling wolves to be hunted
and populations reduced across the EU. Many populist politicians across
Europe hope that talking up the threat of the wolf – alongside tough
measures to tackle it – will win support ahead of next summer’s
elections to the European parliament. It’s a low-cost way of showing
rural voters you’re on their side. “Wolves are a subject that might
change elections,” says one German conservationist.
Ms. von der Leyen is lying. We are talking livestock losses in the 4000 range annually, and as I have noted before, neither people nor pet dogs (there has been issues between hunting dogs and wolves) are at any meaningful threat.
A few thousand generations of evolution has convinced wolves that humans are best avoided.
People have woven myths, stories and fears around wolves since human culture began. For wolf-lovers, the animal’s recovery after it was hunted to extinction in much of Europe is a vital sign of hope – that nature can be restored; that humans can peacefully coexist with fellow predators; that the environmental benefits of returning an apex predator will cascade through the landscape. The impact of wolves returning to Yellowstone national park in the US – reducing grazing herbivores and allowing diverse vegetation to flourish – has caught the popular imagination (a YouTube video, How Wolves Change Rivers, has been watched 44m times), although scientists point out that wolf impacts have been overstated. On the other side, wolf-haters claim that this ruthless carnivore’s return has been naively championed by the tofu-munching wokerati who know nothing of the countryside, elevate the welfare of animals above people, and inflict misery upon farmers, hunters and country folk.
………
When [Wolf expert Kenny] Kenner first began these walks, “there was this excitement about how horrible the wolf was”. People were scared to stroll in the forest with their dogs. But that’s changed over time, he says. “We shouldn’t feel threatened, but we should feel awed. Seeing them is an honour. But I wouldn’t want to cuddle them.”
Just a note for my reader(s), I don't care if it's something cute and cuddly, like a raccoon, or a lynx, or a wolverine, or a diamondback rattlesnake, or a great white shark, Don't Cuddle Wild Animals! Just don't.
………
The Kenners are dismayed by what they see as populist and right-wing politicians creating a culture war over the wolf. To conservationists, von der Leyen’s comments about risks to people are inflammatory. During the wolf’s 23-year recolonisation of Germany, there are no documented cases of one even growling at a person; boar pose a much more frequent threat. There are no incidents of wolves killing people in the west of Russia in modern times; historic fatalities are from a bygone era when lone children shepherded animals in the forests. “In our society, the danger to children is nearly zero,” says Kenner. In countries such as Finland, wolves sometimes attack trained hunting dogs in the forests, but pets are rarely victims. And wolves are wary of people. Kenner shows me clips from his camera traps. One detects him walking in front of the trap. A few hours later, a wolf arrives, sniffs his tracks and moves swiftly in the opposite direction. “The wolf is not shy,” says Kenner. “He’s careful. He’s a predator, he needs to take care, but he has to take risks, too – that’s why he won’t learn from being shot.”
Von der Leyen, argues Kenner, is using her position “to start a campaign in favour of shooting wolves because of her personal ideas and experiences”. “This is a misuse of power. But it’s not just Ursula von der Leyen. In Lower Saxony, there are a lot of other politicians saying, ‘This is a catastrophe,’ and a lot of fact-free inducement to change policy.”
Von der Leyen is not, "Using her position," to launch a jihad against wolves, she is ABusing her position to launch a jihad against wolves.
I'm not surprised that Ursula von der Leyen is doing this. Her entire life is a case study for failing up that would make Dick Cheney jealous.
