27 July 2021

Could Not Happen to a Nicer Insurrectionist

Both the House Counsel and the Department of Justice have determined that Representative Mo Brooks (R-GA AL) was not acting in his scope of office when he exhorted the insurrectionists to invade the Capitol, which means that he has to hire his own lawyers, and it is far less likely that he will be able to convince a judge that he is entitled to qualified immunity.

Essentially, both sets of lawyers determined that Brooks was engaging in electioneering, so Representative Eric Swalwell's (D-CA) lawsuit against Mo Brooks for incitement and conspiracy can proceed:

The Justice Department declined on Tuesday to defend a congressional ally of former President Donald J. Trump in a lawsuit accusing them both of inciting supporters at a rally in the hours before the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol.

Law enforcement officials determined that Representative Mo Brooks, Republican of Alabama, was acting outside the scope of his duties in an incendiary speech just before the attack, according to a court filing. Mr. Brooks had asked the department to certify that he was acting as a government employee during the rally; had it agreed to defend him, he would have been dismissed from the lawsuit and the United States substituted as a defendant.

“The record indicates that Brooks’s appearance at the Jan. 6 rally was campaign activity, and it is no part of the business of the United States to pick sides among candidates in federal elections,” the Justice Department wrote.

“Members of Congress are subject to a host of restrictions that carefully distinguish between their official functions, on the one hand, and campaign functions, on the other.”

………

Lawyers for the House also said on Tuesday that they declined to defend Mr. Brooks in the lawsuit. Given that it “does not challenge any institutional action of the House,” a House lawyer wrote in a court filing, “it is not appropriate for it to participate in the litigation.”

The Justice Department and House filed their briefs on Tuesday, the deadline set by Judge Amit P. Mehta of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit, filed in March by Representative Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California, accuses Mr. Brooks of inciting a riot and conspiring to prevent a person from holding office or performing official duties.

Mr. Swalwell accused Mr. Brooks, Mr. Trump, his son Donald Trump Jr. and his onetime personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani of playing a key role in inciting the Jan 6. attack during a rally near the White House in the hours before the storming of the Capitol.

I am not sure whether Swalwell will prevail, but discovery for this lawsuit is going to be VERY revealing.

1 comments :

John said...

Congressman Brooks is from Alabama,not GA.

Post a Comment