I am referring, of course, to Elon Musk, whose empire has been subsidized to the tune of almost $5 billion.
The actual number is likely far higher, given the indirect subsidies received, such as allowing PayPal, where he made original fortune, function like a bank without having to follow banking regulations, "Because ……… Internet."
All of these fortunes have resulted from government subsidies, whether it's Amazon's early ability to evade sales taxes, Google's military funding, etc.
The reporters at the LA Times have almost certainly missed some of the subsidies, because many, if not most, of them are indirect:
Los Angeles entrepreneur Elon Musk has built a multibillion-dollar fortune running companies that make electric cars, sell solar panels and launch rockets into space.These are not long-shot startups. These are meticulously constructed to extract maximum subsidies.
And he’s built those companies with the help of billions in government subsidies.
Tesla Motors Inc., SolarCity Corp. and Space Exploration Technologies Corp., known as SpaceX, together have benefited from an estimated $4.9 billion in government support, according to data compiled by The Times. The figure underscores a common theme running through his emerging empire: a public-private financing model underpinning long-shot start-ups.
………
Los Angeles entrepreneur Elon Musk has built a multibillion-dollar fortune running companies that make electric cars, sell solar panels and launch rockets into space.
And he’s built those companies with the help of billions in government subsidies.
Tesla Motors Inc., SolarCity Corp. and Space Exploration Technologies Corp., known as SpaceX, together have benefited from an estimated $4.9 billion in government support, according to data compiled by The Times. The figure underscores a common theme running through his emerging empire: a public-private financing model underpinning long-shot start-ups.
Also, SolarCity was not a long-shot, it was a corrupt bailout of his cousins who had run the company into the ground.
But public subsidies for Musk’s companies stand out both for the amount, relative to the size of the companies, and for their dependence on them.Yes, they are short sellers, but that should not mask Musk's hypocrisy in preaching rugged individualism while meticulously constructing his companies to maximize taxpayer subsidies.
“Government support is a theme of all three of these companies, and without it none of them would be around,” said Mark Spiegel, a hedge fund manager for Stanphyl Capital Partners who is shorting Tesla’s stock, a bet that pays off if Tesla shares fall.
0 comments :
Post a Comment