Case in point, Bill Gates, who appears to believe that he is an expert on nuclear power and global warming, so he is wringing his hands over the lack of new nuclear nuclear power plants in the US:
Bill Gates is urging the United States to invest in nuclear power research.First, the construction time for a nuclear power plant is on the order of a decade.
In his annual year-in-review Gates Notes blog post, Gates noted that, despite the consequences of climate change that people face around the globe, “global emissions of greenhouse gases went up in 2018.”
Because burning fossil fuels (oil, coal, and natural gas) releases carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere, Gates wrote that we need breakthroughs in clean energy in order to curb the rise of global temperatures. Generating energy from sunlight and wind does not emit CO2; the same goes for nuclear energy.
“The world needs to be working on lots of solutions to stop climate change,” Gates wrote. “Advanced nuclear is one, and I hope to persuade US leaders to get into the game.”
Second, one of the largest contributors to anthropogenic climate change is cement, and nuclear power uses a very large amount of that.
Third, the total life cycle costs, which are a good measure of total emissions are off the f%$#ing charts, so while fission emits no carbon, construction, enrichment, transportation of fuel, and disposal of waste, are major emitters.
So the savings are illusory, the costs are unsustainable, and the time frame is too long.
1 comments :
I agree. It's amazing how wrong Gates is on so manuy issues. Remember how he could not see how a PC would ever need more than 640K RAM?
Post a Comment