25 December 2010
Well, it appears that they are looking at a common airframe intended to do both.
So a jack of no trades and a master of none, because when you combine these disparate needs, and requirements, you end up with something that just does not work.
See the cancelled Naval F-111B, for instance.
I'm with Bill Sweetman on this, "The people promoting these abominations are secretly working for Airbus Military."