On Receiving the Largess of the House of Saud

I have followed the entire "rent-a-crowd" hysteria regarding Charles Freeman's appointment as chair of the National Intelligence Council, but I really haven't had anything to add, but in commenting on this Ken Silverstein of Harper's Magazine asks the following:

So why is the Middle East Policy Council any more intellectually corrupt than AEI or WINEP? And why is employment at the former a bar to government employment, but a job at the last two is not?

The answer here is not is not that the MEPC is in any way more corrupt, either legally or intellectually than the AEI or WINEP.

Rather, it is that Saudi money is perceived as dirty, while the money going to the AEI and WINEP is largely domestic wingnut, which is perceived as "cleaner".

As corrupt as domestic wingnuts are, and they are very corrupt, their history of selling opinions to big bucks backers has long been document, but the House of Saud is a poster child for bad governance, bad policy, and bad governmental structures, being one of the few remaining absolute monarchies in the world, and even by that standard it is remarkably venal and corrupt.

I think that the hit on Freeman was wrong and stupid, but the idea that Saudi money should be viewed as both corrupt and corrupting is very close to the truth of the matter.

If an organization wants to be taken seriously, it should steer clear of Saudi money.