The Guardian has just had the defamation suit filed against it by United Healthcare dismissed.
The judge determined that the story that the paper reported, that UHC was bribing nursing homes to decrease transfers to hospitals, was true, and truth is always a defense against defamation.
A state judge in Delaware has dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought against the Guardian by the UnitedHealth Group.
Delaware superior court judge Calvin Scott’s ruling stemmed from a lawsuit that the US’s largest health insurance conglomerate pursued against the Guardian in May 2025 over an investigation by the outlet which reported that UnitedHealth secretly made payments to nursing homes to reduce hospital transfers for residents.
………
In a ruling issued on Monday, Scott granted the Guardian’s motion to dismiss. And he dismissed all six defamation claims in the lawsuit.
“The article’s reporting of the bonuses as ‘secret’ or made ‘secretly’ or ‘quietly,’ is substantially true,” Scott wrote in one part of the ruling.
In another part, he added that the Guardian “is not required to publish facts just because United would have preferred more favorable facts”.
Yeah, there's a reason that UHC is the most widely loathed health insurance company in America.


0 comments :
Post a Comment