Well, This Is a First

In Oregon, Federal Judge Mustafa Kasubhai threw out a lawsuit by the Federal government demanding that Oregon turn over their voter roles.

At the core of his reasoning is that the DoJ no longer has the, "Presumption of regularity,"which is another way of saying that they are lying through their teeth.

A federal judge in Oregon issued a sweeping rebuke of the Justice Department’s nationwide push to seize state voter rolls, ruling that the department can no longer be presumed to be acting in good faith and warning that its conduct threatens voters and states’ rights.

And the judge cited a recent letter sent by Attorney General Pam Bondi linking the voter roll crusade to the deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in Minnesota as one reason to doubt the department’s truthfulness.

In a sharply worded opinion released Thursday, U.S. District Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai concluded that the department’s public statements and actions stripped it of the trust courts typically afford federal law enforcement agencies.

Kasubhai had already announced from the bench — on two separate occasions — that the DOJ’s lawsuit seeking Oregon’s unredacted voter registration data would be dismissed.

“The presumption of regularity that has been previously extended to Plaintiff that it could be taken at its word — with little doubt about its intentions and stated purposes — no longer holds,” Kasubhai wrote. “When Plaintiff, in this case, conveys assurances that any private and sensitive data will remain private and used only for a declared and limited purpose, it must be thoroughly scrutinized and squared with its open and public statements to the contrary.”

The short version is that Attorney General Bondi's letter to Minnesota demanding complete voter rolls in exchange for ICE thugs standing down shows them to be dishonest.

………

Kasubhai pointed specifically to the letter to Minnesota from Bondi that tied federal immigration enforcement to demands for voter data as the smoking gun, saying it cast doubt on the DOJ’s stated motives.

“The context of this demand within a letter about immigration enforcement casts serious doubt as to the true purposes for which Plaintiff is seeking voter registration lists in this and other cases, and what it intends to do with that data,” he wrote.

While the judge was explicit that the case could be dismissed on the law alone and had already planned to dismiss the case before the Minnesota letter was drafted, he went out of his way to say DOJ’s public conduct now undermines the “presumption of regularity” it has long enjoyed.

So basically, he said that they could not be trusted, and also noted that even if they did, their case was complete bullsh%$.

His ruling is already being cited in other jurisdictions.