I have finally discovered that she serves a purpose. She is an excellent reverse barometer: If you reflexively disagree with her, you are almost certain to be right.
Case in point, her Op/Ed suggesting that police blotters should be made private.
Because some scumbags on the internet are posting people's mugshots online, and demanding
My initial reaction was, "I'm against it."
Then I looked at her examples. They were all hipster trustifarians who got caught with a joint, or some X, or got busted for drunk driving, like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, and because daddy has some money, they lawyered up and got a deferred adjudication.
We as a society need to have this information, even if there are ratf%$#s are out there who are attempting extortion.
I knew I was right as soon as I knew that I disagreed with McArdle, and on closer examination this was confirmed.
0 comments :
Post a Comment