Just in Case You are Wondering

Click for full size

---

Lazard HQ, Let's bring pitch forks and torches,
30 Rockefeller Center, New York City, NY

Well, one of the older investment banks out there, Lazard Ltd. formed in 1848, just declared a profit in the 4^th quarter.

Wait, no, they didn't they had a loss.

Why did they have a loss? Because they decided that they had to issue yet another round of indefensible bonuses to their staff:

What should have been a profitable quarter a Lazard Ltd. turned into a surprising loss due to the investment bank paying its people big bonuses.

The firm doled out $616 million in compensation and benefits to about 2,300 employees last quarter, or more than triple the amount handed out in the same period in 2008. It was a consequence, Lazard said, of a decision to pay more bonuses in cash and accelerate some deferred cash awards from a prior year. But so great was the firm's generosity that compensation costs overwhelmed quarterly revenues and resulted in a net loss of about $55 million for the fourth quarter. The charges also almost wiped out full-year profits.

Lazard Chief Executive Kenneth Jacobs, who took over from the late Bruce Wasserstein last fall, argued that he had no choice but to pay his people to protect and build the franchise. Lazard was one of the few major Wall Street firms to avoid government bailout assistance.

“[Our compensation policies] should enhance our competitiveness and drive shareholder value,” Mr. Jacobs said, in a prepared statement. “Our goal is to grow annual compensation expense at a slower rate than revenues.

(emphasis mine)

Note the comment about shareholder value. Lazard has been publicly held since 2005, but what the f%$#, just screw the share holders.

BTW, their goal, "to grow annual compensation expense at a slower rate than revenues," that means that their goal is to make a profit …………… some day …………… in the indeterminate future …………… because compensation is pretty much their only expense, ex- renting some office space, and pay a few licensing fees.

They are spending over ½ million an employee:

For all of 2009, Lazard had $11 million in earnings, down sharply from the prior year's $196 million. Total compensation costs for all of 2009 were a little over $1.3 billion, or an average $565,000 per employee.

Mr. Jacobs' remarks about pay come a day after Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman promised to rein in compensation this year at his firm. At Morgan Stanley, compensation ate up 62% of revenues last year. At Lazard, it was 72%. Typically, half of Wall Street revenues go out in compensation.

So, under the normal and customary rules, half the gross revenue, you know, before expenses goes to an already overpaid staff, but it's not enough for the vampire squids smaller cousins.

Congress needs to change laws to allow shareholders to truly hold managers accountable.

I'm also wondering if shareholders have grounds for a suit here, since it's pretty clear that management is ignoring them, and the well being of the company, in its decisions.