Within the Scope of Employment? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?!?!

It appears that the US Government is claiming that torture is in the normal scope of employment, which gives a new meaning to the term, "Banality of Evil," which was coined to describe the actions of Adolph Eichmann and his motivations.

Citing the Westfall Act, [Barack Obama appointee Assistant Attorney General] Tony West wrote that "the type of activities alleged against the individual defendants were 'foreseeable' and were 'a direct outgrowth' of their responsibility to detain and gather intelligence from suspected enemy combatants." In defending the government's position, West cited case law stating that "genocide, torture, forced relocation, and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment by individual defendants employed by Department of Defense and State Department were within scope of employment" and similar cases justifying CIA torture as part of official duty.

"It is essentially saying torture is all in a day's work when it comes to holding people in military detention," says Shane Kadidal, who heads the Guantánamo project at CCR. In that case, the issue was not whether Rumsfeld and the others were "employees" but whether they were doing official business. Blackwater's argument is a tougher sell, says Morrison. "Does it hold water?" he asks. "It holds Blackwater."

Great Googly Moogly, within the scope of employment?