Instead of immunity, they are putting forward giving, "the federal courts special authorization to hear classified evidence and decide whether the phone companies should be held liable." Meaning that their answer to Bush's demand for a coverup is even more judicial overview with regard to spying on Americans.
Word that I've read is that the freshman Democrats are very opposed to immunity, and my not so educated guess is that when they went on recess, that the reps got hundreds, if not thousands, of "attaboys" from theid constituents.
The Bush administration hates the bill, and the response for John Conyers and Sylvestre Reyes is brutal:
The Administration, which has refused to even attend negotiation sessions between the House and the Senate, has now apparently launched another round of scare tactics and falsehoods. The American people expect government officials to wrestle with these difficult issues and reach common sense solutions that protect Americans from terrorism and preserve our civil liberties. Unfortunately, the President’s advisors seem more inclined to issue ‘my way or the highway’ press releases concerning a bill the Administration hasn’t even read. The Congress will continue to give this issue the careful consideration it deserves and we hope the Administration will change course and join us in this effort.
I don't know who put some steel in their spine, but it feels good.
FWIW, Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who got bunked by Reid on immunity, likes the House bill too.
So does the EFF.
0 comments :
Post a Comment