It appears that inconveniencing banks means more to him than giving our troops the payraise they deserve.
That being, this rather insightful analysis is correct: If he wants to do this, then he has to put his name on the veto with those
The Senate has remained in session to prevent recess appointments, and as such his claim, "The adjournment of the Congress has prevented my return of H.R. 1585 within the meaning of Article I, section 7, clause 2 of the Constitution", is completely without merit.
If you really find this provision so bad, stop behaving like what Ahnuld would call a "Girlie Man", and put your name on a veto that cuts pay for the troops.
Don't worry, it's not like any or your kids will be affected.
0 comments :
Post a Comment