Free Trade: The Best Weapon Against the “Free Traders”

Dean Baker makes the point that the free trade evangelists would not be so supportive of free trade if their necks were on the line. (I should note that I made a similar point about press outsourcing to India in Pasadena California).

I am already a member of a profession abused by immigration policies (H1B and L1 visas), so Baker's point that protected professions should be opened up to competition makes sense to me:

The big winners in this story are the workers who manage to keep themselves protected from international competition. As a result of recent trade and immigration policy, these highly paid professionals can buy low cost furniture, cars, and clothes. They can also have their homes renovated and their gardens maintained at low prices. They can even get cheap nannies for their kids.

But the key to the success of these highly paid workers is maintaining their own protection from international competition. There are long list of professional and immigration barriers that protect doctors, lawyers, and even economists and journalists from the same sort of international competition faced by textile workers and dishwashers.

In addition to the professional and licensing barriers that impose obstacles to foreign professionals working in the United States, there are also immigration barriers. These barriers prohibit a Wal-Mart Hospital or Wal-Mart University from hiring the lowest cost qualified foreign professionals from anywhere in the world, in the same way that Wal-Mart buys the cheapest clothes and toys from any country in the world.

The way to fix this problem is simple: we create transparent licensing requirements for the licensed professions that can be met by students training anywhere in the world. (Let them have test sites in their own country—administered by U.S. certified testers, of course.) We then remove any comparable pay requirements for these professions. The rule is free trade, just like with steel and clothes. If a Chinese doctor is willing to work in the U.S. for $50,000 a year or an Indian journalist is willing to work for $30,000, then they can be hired at these wages as easily as Wal-Mart buys cheap toys from China.

Word Up! Particularly the journalists and economists.