03 January 2018

Why Am I Not Surprised?

I just found out that in most states, "Hairstylists are Required to Attend Significantly More Training Than Cops."

I guess that a blow drier is more dangerous than a Glock:
Absurdity is a common trait of bureaucracies. But nothing says “we have no clue about the laws we pass” more than state requirements for law enforcement training.

Police are given the trust of the municipalities in which they ‘serve’ to uphold the rule of law. They are given a gun and vehicle and a certain level of autonomy in order to accomplish this task.

They consistently find or place themselves in compromising positions in which they must make life or death decisions; decisions which affect the lives of every person in this country.

………

With all of these particularly intricate responsibilities, one would naturally come to the conclusion that a police officer should be required to attend a significant amount of training to achieve maximum proficiency.

Some would assume that the required training to become a trustee of public safety and carry the vast responsibility of a police officer would require considerably more time than say, the training that it takes to learn how to cut hair.

However, they would assume incorrectly.
In New York, hairstylists need 50% more training than cops, and in California,  it's 140% more.

Something is seriously f%$#ed up.

0 comments :

Post a Comment