Teachers union officials denounced a ruling Tuesday by a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge deeming job protections for teachers in California as unconstitutional as a misguided attack on teachers and students.Rather unsurprisingly, privatizer in chief, Arne Duncan, loves this, because for Wall Street to make money off of our children, they first have to make sure that they have a cowed and cheap work force.
The ruling represents a major loss for the unions and a groundbreaking win by attorneys who argued that state laws governing teacher layoffs, tenure and dismissals harm students by making them more likely to suffer from grossly ineffective instruction.
If the preliminary ruling becomes final and is upheld, the effect will be sweeping across California and possibly the nation.
Judge Rolf M. Treu ruled, in effect, that it was too easy for teachers to gain strong job protections and too difficult to dismiss those who performed poorly in the classroom. If the ruling stands, California will have to craft new rules for hiring and firing teachers.
Interestingly enough I had occasion to look up the record of Geoffrey Canada, the hero of the anti-teacher agitprop Waiting for Superman, the former CEO of the Harlem Children's Zone charter schools in response to a sickeningly hagiographic article about him.
What did I discover?
- He was paid $553,000 for a school system with just 1500 students, (link) more than twice the salary of the Chancellor of the New York City Schools (link) a system with 1.1 million students.
- He lied about the graduation rates, basing his numbers on those the graduation rate for entering seniors, not the rate for people entering as freshmen as is the norm, which would yield a 36% drop out rate. (link)
- He has "fired" (dumped) entire classes, including what would have been his first high school class to make his numbers look good. (link)
You have looting behind a not-for-profit corporate façade (Rocketship), widespread forgery and fraud in testing (Michelle Rhee), sexual and financial irregularities (Kevin Johnson, Michelle Rhee's husband), insane levels of teacher turnover (all of them), and aggressive policies to foist low performing students back on the public school district. (again, pretty much all of them)
Seriously, whenever you take a cursory look at the charter school movement, and the educational-industrial complex that supports them, there are layers of corruption and opacity that are at the core of their business models.
At the core of the issues with our educational system are societal problems of grinding poverty, a porous social safety net, and law enforcement that frequently acts more like an occupying force than peace officers in poor neighborhoods.
Until these are resolved, we will have problems educating poor children, no matter how well our schools are run.
But the current focus on fill in the box testing and privatizing education serves only to make money off the backs of our children's future.
2 comments :
I have to say that the article is terrible. There is too little information on what was the basis of the judge's decision.
Was it the CA or US constitution, and if so what parts. Was he just ruling that the law was a bad idea (which should never make it unconstitutational) or was there a real issues.
I wish the papers were clearer.
I also wish teachers were easier to defend. Most of them suck.
I think that the article is terrible because the ruling is terrible.
I've read sections of the decision, and it is completely incoherent.
It's basically a list of buzzwords from the (sell public education to Wall Street) educational reform crowd.
As to many teachers sucking, to quote Ted Sturgeon, "90% of everything is crap."
I would also add that the whole no child left behind/common core crap is making things worse, not better.
Post a Comment