Well, it turns out that, in addition to being priced at larcenous expensive, the evidence of its efficacy is simply not there:
The German agency performed this assessment based on a dossier submitted by the drug manufacturer (presumably Gilead). The assessment found some reason to think the drug beneficial, but that the evidence was sparse, left many questions unanswered, and was inadequate to assess the drug for some important patient populations. At this point, only a summary is available in English. It includes links to further information in German.It also turns out that the study was not double blind.
………
Thus the assessment concluded that the drug company dossier included at best irrelevant data that it tried to pass off as important, and inexplicably left out other data that might have been relevant.
………
Summary
The Sovaldi case is a signal example of how our health care system is awash in marketing hype and public relations buzz that has swamped rational skeptical thinking about logic and evidence. That marketing and PR is ever enriching managers while it will send the rest of us, health care professionals included, to the poor house. And all the money we spend will not buy us the promised miracles and triumphs.
True health care reform would revisit the pact society once made with drug, biotechnology and device companies meant to promote reasonably priced innovation, but now promoting oligarchy; support transparency and honesty in clinical research; and challenge how health care managers can make millions or billions from unproven, and sometimes worthless or dangerous products.
So the wonder drug may not be any more effective than existing drugs, and it costs a lot more.
1 comments :
One neat thing about publicly held drug companies is that you can compare their spending on R&D vs. marketing in black and white. It amazes me when anyone expresses surprise that marketing vastly trumps R&D. It's also why we have no new antibiotics less than ten years out.
Post a Comment