Two things happened that day:
- Verizon refused to allow the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) to send out alerts to people who had requested them, because the content was deemed to be, "controversial or unsavory". (They later reversed themselves)
- Pudding Media demonstrated an ad supported VOIP system, where voice recognition is used to provide ads that are appropriate to the conversation's context.
When it comes to the two events of Sept. 26, I worry about the misuse of technology similar to what Pudding Media is using. Not only would it be easy to provide transcripts of our calls to authorities, but all calls could be parsed in real time. Say the wrong thing and your call could be interrupted or you could get an immediate visit from some guys with guns in a big sport-utility vehicle.It's more than creepy. It is very, very likely. It's like some vision of George Orwell or William Gibson, and it's closer than most of us would like to think.
Such a scenario would not be in the interest of phone companies, and it certainly wouldn't be tolerated by civil-liberties minded Americans. But based on what I've seen since 9/11, I have no doubt some in government and the private sector would love to see this happen.
The mere thought of it is creepy.
Even more than its use to arrest dissenters, is its use by folks like Bush and His Evil Minions&trade to blackmail political opponents. It's Karl Rove's wet dream, and it's Verizon's wet dream too, because they can use the tech to become the advertising conduit for everything.
If property rights for private operators trump civil rights for people, we are already 90% of the way there.
I'd scream, but I have laryngitis (really...chest cold).
0 comments :
Post a Comment